As promised, here is the Film Guide, first assessment 2019. We will go over this in class, but it's a good idea for you to become familiar with it on your own as well.
In addition, here is a link to the assessment materials.
Sunday, October 29, 2017
Friday, October 27, 2017
Man With a Movie Camera
Watch the film...
Your Looking at Movies textbook has a nice quote about Vertov and his film on page 428.
Vertov shows us how to frame reality and movement: through the human eye and the camera eye, or through windows and shutters. But to confound us, he also shows us--through such devices as the freeze-frame, split screen, stop-action, slow motion, and fast motion--how the cinematographer and editor can transform the movements of life into something that is unpredictable. He not only proves that the camera has a life of its own, but also reminds us of the editor, who is putting all of this footage together. Reality may be in the control of the artist, his camera, and its tricks, but it also finds definition within the editor's presentation and, ultimately, the viewer's perception.
In your first well-developed paragraph, please discuss this quote in relation to a five minute piece of Man With a Movie Camera. Be sure to describe shots cinematically, as if I've never seen the film before. Discuss elements of editing, such as the juxtaposition of shots, rhythm, montage, etc.
In your second well-developed paragraph, discuss this quote in relation to a film of your choice. Try to be as specific as possible in your descriptions and speak cinematically when you discuss the film.
Battleship Potemkin
"The film has a collective hero; the Russian masses—the mutineers on the Potemkin, the people of Odessa, the sailors who mutiny on the other ships—who rebel against Tsarist oppression.
Despite the film's documentary look, it was very carefully constructed on every level, from the distribution of line, mass, and light in individual shots to the perfectly balanced five-act structure of the overall film. The most remarkable feature of the film's construction, however, is the montage editing.
Eisenstein's theory of montage—based on the Marxist dialectic, which involves the collision of thesis and antithesis to produce a synthesis incorporating features of both—deals with the juxtaposition of shots, and attractions (e.g. lighting, camera angle, or subject movement) within shots, to create meaning. Rather than the smooth linkage of shots favored by many of his contemporaries (e.g. V. I. Pudovkin and D. W. Griffith). Eisenstein was interested in the collision and dialectical synthesis of contradictory shots as a way to shock and agitate the audience."
Think about the above quote (from the essay by Clyde Kelly Dunagan in the handout I gave you). In 2 paragraphs, discuss (CINEMATICALLY) if and how Eisenstein's theory works. Be sure to use the cinematic vocabulary you have learned. If you need to, use your glossary in Looking at Movies.
In paragraph 3, discuss a film you have seen that uses discontinuity editing or at the very least seems influenced by Eisenstein's method. Discuss the film CINEMATICALLY as you would discuss a film we watch in class.
Here is a link to the film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TgWoSHUn8c
Thursday, October 19, 2017
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari & Nosferatu
We watched The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari in class. Watch Nosferatu on your own...you might want to watch it with the lights on.
German Expressionism was developed at a precarious time period in history. These two films present underlying issues that were taking place in Germany at the time. What are these issues and how are they presented cinematically? Include at least one quote from a reputable source (preferably the essays I handed out to you) and include evidence from the films to back up everything you say.
What specific innovations in film style were developed in these two films? You may choose to speak about any films of your choice to compare, but be specific and thorough.
German Expressionism was developed at a precarious time period in history. These two films present underlying issues that were taking place in Germany at the time. What are these issues and how are they presented cinematically? Include at least one quote from a reputable source (preferably the essays I handed out to you) and include evidence from the films to back up everything you say.
What specific innovations in film style were developed in these two films? You may choose to speak about any films of your choice to compare, but be specific and thorough.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)